Article PDF (Українська)


diabetes mellitus, ultrasound steatometry, controlled attenuation parameter (CAP), PPARG, pioglitazone, adherence

Abstract views: 40
PDF Downloads: 10

How to Cite

Shypulin, V., & Melnyk, N. (2020). OPPORTUNITIES OF ADJUVANT THERAPY WITH PIOGLITAZONE OF NON-ALCOHOLIC FATТУ LIVER DISEASE СO-OCURRING WITH OBESITY. Medical Science of Ukraine (MSU), 16(1), 22-30. https://doi.org/10.32345/2664-4738.1.2020.04


Relevance. The «Global Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases 2013-2020» approved by the WHO is dedicated to noncommunicable diseases. Among them - diabetes mellitus, which is a consequence of overweight \ obesity and lack of exercise. Pioglitazone is the only drug on the pharmacological market for the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), regardless of diabetic mellitus status. Currently, the treatment of early NASH in the prevention of both type 2 diabetes and CVD, and amelioration of NASH progression is a priority task.

Objective – to study the effectiveness of treatment with pioglitazone in patients with obesity and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).

Materials that methods. 123 patients with obesity 1, 2, 3 classes in combination with NAFLD were included in our research during 3 months. The randomization method of patients was divided into two groups, comparable in age, sex, and body mass index. All patients were offered drug-free treatment that included lifestyle modification: a reduction in diet of 500 kcal from the physiological daily energy expenditure and its physical activity for 150-200 min per week, the problems of adherence to recommendations were additionally discussed during the visits. The patients of the case group adhered to the basic recommendations and received pioglitazone 15 mg / day additionally as a drug treatment. Patients in the control group adhered only to principles of drug-free treatment. Overall, the program consisted of 5 visits over 3 months period. All patients underwent anthropometric measurements, laboratory and instrumental examinations (Ultrasound steatometry) before and after 12 weeks of treatment. Also studied adherence to treatment in two groups of patients using self-report questionnaire.

Results. A comparative analysis of the data obtained in patients with obesity and NAFLD from the group of pioglitazone (daily dose of 15 mg) revealed the best major metabolic markers, such as significantly decreased values in waist circumference (p<0,0001), uric acid (p=0,001), thriglycerides (p=0,02) and very low density lipoproteins cholesterol(p=0,003), atherogenic coefficient (p=0,002), fasting insulin (p=0,004) and C-peptide, HOMA-IR index (p=0,01) and increased level of high density lipoproteins cholesterol (p=0,009), respectively. A significant association was found between the target reduction of controlled attenuation parameter and treatment with pioglitazone 15 mg (OR 0,27, 95% CI 0,13–0,56, p=0,001). The dynamics of steatosis had a medium correlation with the final adherence level (r=0,52), regardless of the method of treatment.

Conclusions. It was found that in Ukrainians with obesity and NAFLD, moderate steatosis occurs in 73% of cases. Pioglitazone is a significantly highly effective drug for the adjuvant therapy of NAFLD.

Article PDF (Українська)


1. Global action plan for the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases 2013-2020 Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013.
2. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Worldwide trends in body-mass index, underweight, overweight, and obesity from 1975 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 2416 population-based measurement studies in 128·9 million children, adolescents, and adults // Lancet. 2017; 390: 2627-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32129-3
3. World Health Organization. Global report on diabetes, 2016. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/204871/9789241565257_eng.pdf;jsessionid=2F0193A0A5A8C31C755A946A8957AD66?sequence=1
4. International Diabetes Foundation. IDF Diabetes Atlas. 9th ed. 2019 Available from https://diabetesatlas.org/en/ Accessed 20 March 2020
5. Center for Medical Statistics of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine [in Ukrainian]. http://medstat.gov.ua/ukr/statdan.html
6. Zhang E., Wartelle-Bladou C., Lepanto L., Lachaine J. Cloutier G. Cost-utility analysis of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis screening // European Society of Radiology. 2015; 25(11): 3282-94. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3731-2.
7. Golabi P., Sayiner M., Fasel Y., Koenig A. Current complications and challenges in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Screening and diagnosis // Expert review of gastroenterology and hepatology. 2015;10(1): 63-71. doi: 10.1586/17474124.2016.1099433
8. Estes C, Razavi H, Loomba R, Younossi Z, Sanyal AJ. Modeling the epidemic of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease demonstrates an exponential increase in burden of disease // Hepatology. 2018 Jan; 67(1):123-33. doi: 10.1002/hep.29466.
9. Doycheva I, Watt KD, Rifai G, et al. Increasing Burden of Chronic Liver Disease Among Adolescents and Young Adults in the USA: A Silent Epidemic // Dig Dis Sci. 2017; 62:1373-80. doi: 10.1007/s10620-017-4492-3.
10. Razavi H. The 3rd Paris NASH Symposium occurred on July 6-7, 2017 at the Institut Pasteur Prospective assessment of disease evolution in NASH. https://forumresearch.org/projects/liver-forum/related-meetings/1466-paris-nash-3
11. Perumpail B.J, Khan M.A., Yoo E.R., Cholankeril G, Kim D., Ahmed A.. Clinical epidemiology and disease burden of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease // World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Dec; 23(47): 8263-76. doi:10.3748/wjg.v23.i47.8263
12. Kitade H., Chen G., Ni Y., Ota T. Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Insulin Resistance: New Insights and Potential New Treatments // Nutrients. 2017; 9(4): 387. doi:10.3390/nu9040387
13. Chen Z., Yu R., Xiong Y., Du F., Zhu S. A vicious circle between insulin resistance and inflammation in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease Lipids in Health and Disease. 2017; 16:203. doi: 10.1186/s12944-017-0572-9
14. Donnelly K.L., Smith C.I., Schwarzenberg S.J., Jessurun J., Boldt M.D., Parks EJ. Sources of fatty acids stored in liver and secreted via lipoproteins in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease // J Clin Invest. 2005; 115: 1343-51. doi: 10.1172/JCI23621.
15. Bugianesi E, Gastaldelli A, Vanni E, et al. Insulin resistance innon-diabetic patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: sites and mechanisms // Diabetologia. 2005; 48: 634-42. doi: 10.1007/s00125-005-1682-x.
16. Graaff D., Kwanten W.J., Francque S.M. The potential role of vascular alterations and subsequent impaired liver blood flow and hepatic hypoxia in the pathophysiology of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis // Medical Hypotheses. 2019; 122:188-97. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2018.11.014.
17. Marchesini G, Brizi M, Morselli-Labate AM, et al. Association of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease with insulin resistance // Am J Med 1999; 107: 450-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(99)00271-5.
18. Korenblat KM, Fabbrini E, Mohammed BS, Klein S. Liver, muscle, and adipose tissue insulin action is directly related to intrahepatictriglyceride content in obese subjects // Gastroenterology 2008;134: 1369-75. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.01.075.
19. Koliaki C, Szendroedi J, Kaul K, Jelenik T, Nowotny P, Jankowiak F, et al. Adaptation of hepatic mitochondrial function in humans with nonalcoholic fatty liver is lost in steatohepatitis // Cell Metab 2015;21:739-46. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2015.04.004.
20. Sanchez‐Lozada L.G., Andres‐Hernando A., Garcia‐Arroyo F.E. et al . Uric acid activates aldose reductase and the polyol pathway for endogenous fructose and fat production causing development of fatty liver in rats // J Biol Chem 2019; 294: 4272-81. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.006158.
21. Gastaldelli A, Cusi K. From NASH to diabetes and from diabetes to NASH: Mechanisms and treatment options // JHEP Reports. 2019;1(4):312-28. doi.org/10.1016/j.jhepr.2019.07.002.
22. Chalasani N., Younossi Z., Lavine J.E., Charlton M., Cusi K., Rinella M. et al. The diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Practice guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases // Hepatology 2018; 67, 328-57. doi: 10.1002/hep.29367.
23. Cholankeril R., Patel V., Perumpail B.J, Yoo E.R., Iqbal U., Sallam S. et al. Anti-Diabetic Medications for the Pharmacologic Management of NAFLD // Diseases. 2018; 6: 93. doi:10.3390/diseases6040093
24. Mazzella N, Ricciardi LM, Mazzotti A, Marchesini G. The role of medications for the management of patients with NAFLD // Clin Liver Dis. 2014; 18: 73-89. doi: 10.1016/j.cld.2013.09.005.
25. .Cheang W.S., Tian X.Y., Wong W.T., Huang Y. The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors in cardiovascular diseases: experimental benefits and clinical challenges // Br. J. Pharmacol. 2015; 172 (23): 5512-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.13029
26. Tripathy D., Schwenke D.C., Banerji M., Bray GA, Buchanan TA, Clement SC, Henry RR, Kitabchi AE, Mudaliar S, Ratner RE, Stentz FB, Musi N, Reaven PD, DeFronzo RA. Diabetes incidence and glucose tolerance after termination of pioglitazone therapy: Results from ACT NOW // J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016; 101 (5): 2056-62. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2015-4202
27. Ward Z.J., Bleich S.N, Cradock A.L., Barrett J.L., Giles C. M., Flax С. et al. Projected U.S. State-Level Prevalence of Adult Obesity and Severe Obesity // N Engl J Med. 2019; 381: 2440-50. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa1909301
28. Yosten G.L.C., Maric-Bilkan C., Luppi P., Wahren J. Physiological effects and therapeutic potential of proinsulin C-peptide // Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2014; 307: E955–E968. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00130.2014.
29. Leighton E., Sainsbury C. AR, Jones G.C. A Practical Review of C-Peptide Testing in Diabetes // Diabetes Ther. 2017 Jun; 8(3): 475-87. doi: 10.1007/s13300-017-0265-4.
30. Jong M., Worp H.B., Graaf Y., Visseren F.L.J., Westerink J. Pioglitazone and the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. A meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials // Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2017; 16: 134. doi: 10.1186/s12933-017-0617-4
31. Filipova E., Uzunova K., Kalinov K., Vekov T. Effects of pioglitazone therapy on blood parameters, weight and BMI: a meta-analysis // Diabetology & Metabolic :Syndrome. 2017; 9: Article 90. doi: 10.1186/s13098-017-0290-5. eCollection 2017
32. Dubois V., Eeckhoute J., Lefebvre P., Staels B. Distinct but complementary contributions of PPAR isotypes to energy homeostasis // J Clin Invest. 2017; 127(4):1202-14. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI88894.
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.