Article PDF


motivation, students, team-based learning

Abstract views: 239
PDF Downloads: 162

How to Cite

Khaitovych, M., Potaskalova, V., Savelieva-Kulyk , N., Temirova, O., & Sytnyk, I. (2019). IMPROVING STUDENTS’ MOTIVATION IN CASE OF TEAM-BASED LEARNING METHOD. Medical Science of Ukraine (MSU), 15(1-2), 74-79.


Relevance. The learning motivation of student is the main goal of the teacher. Perspective is introducing of active forms of teaching.

Objective of the research was to specify the influence of method of team-based learning (TBL) on students’ motivation.

Materials and methods. The assessment of the method of TBL was provided among the students of 4th and 5th educational year of pharmaceutical faculty, students of 5th educational year of medical and stomatological faculties. For the purpose to specify the relation of students to TBL method, obtained by means of their anonymous questionnaire survey.

Results. Generally 68 (81,9 %) of all students (92,3 % students of medical faculty, 66,7 % students of stomatological faculty, 82,8 % students of pharmaceutical faculty) were defined that this method improve learning motivation, 9 students (10,8 %) disagree with this approach (7,7 % students of medical, 8,3 % of dentist and 10,3 % of pharmaceutical faculties), the other 6 students (7,2 %) undecided about the method. Moreover, 62,6 % of students defined TBL as better learning strategy, 54,2 % ‑ more effective in realization of educational goals, 74,70 % and 55,42 % of students pointed out that this method make it possible for better use of study time  and discuss more of educational material respectively, 68,67 % and  85,54 % ‑ stimulate the independent study and attention, 65,1 % of respondents consider this method have to use for introducing on practical classes.

Conclusion. The method of team-based learning have increased learning motivation due to assessment of 81,9 % students.
Article PDF


Mishina N.V., Ilchenko S.I., Yefanova A.A. Dynamics of the indicators of educational motivation of medical students at different stages of learning // Zdorov’e Rebenka. 2019; 14 (2): 96-102. [Ukrainian]

Bushuieva I., Sikorska M., Kandybei N. Improving the quality of education of medical students is an important aspect in the training of future qualified specialists. [Ukrainian]

Fomenko K.I., Kuznetsov O.I. Motivational features of the students’ academic self-regulation // Problems of Modern Psychology. 2014; Issue 25: 582-596. [Ukrainian]

Sheldon K.M. Introduction to the self-determination theory (sdt) and new approaches to the growth motivation // Siberian journal of psychology. 2016; 62: 7-17. [Russian]

Farland M.Z., Sicat B.L., Franks A.S., Pater K.S., Medina M.S., Persky A.M. Best Practices for Implementing Team-Based Learning in Pharmacy Education // American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 2013; 77 (8): Article 177.

Brissette A., Howes D. Motivation In Medical Education: A Systematic Review // Webmed Central Medical Education. 2010; 1 (12): WMC001261.

Budhathoki S.S., Zwanikken P.A.C., Pokharel P.K. Factors influencing medical students’motivation to practise in rural areas in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review // BMJ Open. 2017; 7: e013501.

Burgess A. Bleasel J., Haq I., Roberts C., Garsia R., Robertson T., Mellis C. Team-based learning (TBL) in the medical curriculum: better than PBL? // BMC Medical Education. 2017; 17: 243.

Datta R., Datta K., Venkatesh M.D. Evaluation of interactive teaching for undergraduate medical students using a classroom interactive response system in India //. Med J Armed Forces India. 2015; 71 (3): 239-45. 10.1016/j.mjafi.2015.04.007.

Hamjah S.H., Ismail Z., Rasit R.M., Rozali E.A. Methods of Increasing Learning Motivation among Students // Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2011; 18: 138-47.

Rajalingam P., Rotgans J.I., Zary N., Ferenczi M.A., Gagnon P., Low-Beer N. et al. Implementation of team-based learning on a large scale: Three factors to keep in mind // Medical teacher. 2018; 40 (6): 582-88.

Lee Y.H., Kim K-J. Enhancement of student perceptions of

learner-centeredness and community of

inquiry in flipped classrooms // BMC Med Educ. 2018; 18: 242.

Wouters A., Croiset G., Galindo-Garre F., Kusurkar R.A. Motivation of medical students: selection by motivation or motivation by selection // BMC Medical Education. 2016; 16: 37.

Ofstad W. Brunner L.J. Team-Based Learning in Pharmacy Education // American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 2013; 77 (4): Article 70.

Ryan R.M., Deci E.L. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being // American Psychologist. 2000; 55 (1): 68-78.

Eksteen M.J. Team-Based Learning Experiences of Fourth-Year Pharmacy Students in a South African University // American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 2018; 82: 1. Article 6167.

Sealy P. Team Based Learning Strategy Applied to Pharmacy Based Courses // J Pharma Care Health Sys. 2015: S2:002.

Shahrbabak S.S. Dehghani M. Comparison of Team-Based Learning and Lecturing Methods in Pharmacological Biotechnology for Pharmacology Students // Strides Dev Med Educ. 2017; 14 (2) : e64093.

Michaelsen L.K., Parmelee D.X., McMahon K.K., Levine R.E. Teambased learning for health professions education: A Guide to Using Small Groups for Improving Learning / Stylus Publishing, LLC. 2008. 256 p.

Williams K.C., Williams C.C. Five key ingredients for improving student motivation // Research in Higher Education Journal. 2011. P. 121-23.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.